[Solved] Planning is the key to successful completion of this course and program-related objectives. The Individual Success Plan (ISP)

Planning is the key to successful completion of this course and program-related objectives. The Individual Success Plan (ISP) assignment requires early collaboration with the course faculty and your course preceptor. Students must establish a plan for successful completion of

1. The required 50 community direct clinical practice experience hours, 50 leadership direct clinical practice hours, and 25 indirect clinical experience hours.
2. Completion of work associated with program competencies.
3. Work associated with completion of the student's capstone project change proposal.

Students will use the "Individual Success Plan" to develop an individual plan for completing practice hours and course objectives. As a part of this process, students will identify the number of hours set aside to meet course goals.

Student expectations and instructions for completing the ISP document are provided in the "NRS-493 Individual Success Plan" resource, located in the Study Materials and in the assignment instructions.

Students should apply concepts from prior courses to critically examine and improve their current practice. Students are expected to integrate scholarly readings to develop case reports that demonstrate increasingly complex and proficient practice.

After the ISP has been developed by the student and approved by the course faculty, students will initiate a preconference with the faculty and preceptor to review the ISP.

Get Free Expert Answer Here

[ANSWERED] Select an ethnic minority group that is represented in the United States (American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian American, Black/African American

 

Select an ethnic minority group that is represented in the United States (American Indian/Alaskan Native, Asian American, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander). Using health information available from Healthy People, the CDC, and other relevant government websites, analyze the health status for this group.

In a paper of 1000-1250 words, compare and contrast the health status of your selected minority group to the national average. Include the following:

1. Describe the ethnic minority group selected. Describe the current health status of this group. How do race and ethnicity influence health for this group?
2. What are the health disparities that exist for this group? What are the nutritional challenges for this group?
3. Discuss the barriers to health for this group resulting from culture, socioeconomics, education, and sociopolitical factors.
4. What health promotion activities are often practiced by this group?
5. Describe at least one approach using the three levels of health promotion prevention (primary, secondary, and tertiary) that is likely to be the most effective in a care plan given the unique needs of the minority group you have selected. Provide an explanation of why it might be the most effective choice.
6. What cultural beliefs or practices must be considered when creating a care plan? What cultural theory or model would be best to support culturally competent health promotion for this population? Why?

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and public health content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.

Get Free Expert Answer and Explanation Here

[ANSWERED] Based on Case Study: Fetal Abnormality and the required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

Based on Case Study: Fetal Abnormality and the required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Get Free Expert Answer and Explanation Here

[ANSWERED] Understanding and applying psychology in one’s everyday life can have numerous benefits and is often the basis of research

Understanding and applying psychology in one’s everyday life can have numerous benefits and is often the basis of research that is conducted in this field. In this assignment, you will write an essay requiring you to employ critical thinking as you contemplate the science of psychology.

You will write this essay from the perspective of a potential first-time researcher. Pretend you are pondering conducting research into the psychological aspects of a specific human behavior you have seen demonstrated in your everyday life (may be personal or work-related).

First, you should start with an introduction that allows the readers to fully understand your intent and the main points of the research you are contemplating. Be sure to identify your research question (e.g. Why do we yawn when we see someone else yawn?)

Next, include the following elements of your intended research:

• describe your vision of the research experiment,
• explain research methods that could be used to describe the behavior in your research experiment, and
• indicate the ethical guidelines you must follow while conducting research involving people.

Finally, in your own words, identify the basic ideas behind early approaches in psychology that may influence your research.

Your essay will be a minimum of two pages in length, double-spaced, and in Times New Roman 12 pt. font. Include your name and course at the top of the first page of your essay.

APA Style will not be required for this assignment. However, keep in mind that when directly quoted or paraphrased works of others are used in any manner, the writer is obligated to properly cite the source of the original narrative. You should become familiar with citing sources, as you will be graded on proper APA citation and reference formatting later in this course, and throughout your future academic endeavors.

Click here for a tutorial on writing an effective essay. A transcript for the tutorial is provided in the Notes section of the presentation.

Get Free Expert Answer and Explanation Here

 

Post a description of your views on whether or not digital inclusion or broad band

Social Determinants of Health

Introduction: Use Walden White paper or the CDC

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022), "Social determinants of health (SDOH) are the nonmedical factors that influence health outcomes. They are the conditions in which people are born, grow, work, live, and age, and the wider set of forces and systems shaping the conditions of daily life... SDOH are one of three priority areas for Healthy People 2030, along with health equity and health literacy.

Healthy People 2030 sets data-driven national objectives in five key areas of SDOH: healthcare access and quality, education access and quality, social and community context, economic stability, and neighborhood and built environment. Some examples of SDOH included in Healthy People 2030 are safe housing, transportation, and neighborhoods; polluted air and water; and access to nutritious foods and physical health opportunities".

To Prepare:

• Reflect on the concept of social determinants of health as presented in the resources.

• Contemplate whether digital inclusion or broad band access should be added to the 5 key areas of social determinants of health.
• Using the optional outside resources or other peer reviewed journal articles, consider how electronic health records, mobile health, patient portals, or telemedicine can impact and be impacted by the social determinants of health.

By Day 3 of Week 9

Post a description of your views on whether or not digital inclusion or broad band access should be added as a key area to the social determinants of health. Be specific and provide examples that support your position. Explain how electronic health records, mobile health, patient portals, or telemedicine can impact and be impacted by the social determinants of health. Support your explanation with the required or optional resources.

Required Readings

• McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2022). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  • Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 293–316)
  • Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety, Quality Outcomes, and Interdisciplinary Collaboration” (pp. 323–349)
  • Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 357–378)
  • Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 383–397)
  • Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 403–432)
• Benda, N. C., Veinot, T. C., Sieck, C. J., & Ancker, J. S. (2020). Broadband internet access is a social determinant of health!

• Links to an external site.. American Journal of Public Health, 110(8), 1123-1125. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305784
• Dykes, P. C., Rozenblum, R., Dalal, A., Massaro, A., Chang, F., Clements, M., Collins, S. …Bates, D. W. (2017). Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study
• Download Prospective evaluation of a multifaceted intervention to improve outcomes in intensive care: The Promoting Respect and Ongoing Safety Through Patient Engagement Communication and Technology Study. Critical Care Medicine, 45(8), e806–e813. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002449
• HealthIT.gov. (2018c). What is an electronic health record (EHR)?
• Links to an external site. Retrieved from
  https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr
• Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement
• Links to an external site.. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221.
• Sieck, C. J., Sheon, A., Ancker, J. S., Castek, J., Callahan, B., & Siefer, A. (2021). Digital inclusion as a social determinant of health
• Links to an external site.. NPJ Digital Medicine, 4(1), 52.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-021-00413-8
• Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications
• Links to an external site.. Informatics, 4(3), 32–40.
• Sharma, P., & Patten, C. A. (2022). A need for digitally inclusive health care service in the United States: Recommendations for clinicians and health care systems

Links to an external site.. Permanente Journal, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/21.156

Place your order now for a similar assignment and get fast, cheap and best quality work written by our expert level  assignment writers.

Use Coupon: NEW30 to Get 30% OFF Your First Order

Article link: https://academicresearchbureau.com/post-a-description-of-your-views-on-whe/

NURS 6053 Week 9 Assignment – Workplace Environment

 

NURS 6053 Week 9 Assignment – Workplace Environment

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
• Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
• Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
• Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
  • Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
  • Clark (2018)
  • Clark (2015)
  • Griffin and Clark (2014)

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

• Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
• Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
• Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
• Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

• Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
• Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
• Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

• Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
• Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

Get Free Full Answer Here: https://universitywritingservices.com/assignment-workplace-environment/

Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness to each of these six articles on why the article may or may

 Topic 3 DQ 1

Submit a summary of six of your articles on the discussion board. Discuss one strength and one weakness to each of these six articles on why the article may or may not provide sufficient evidence for your practice change

Topic 3 DQ 2

Name two different methods for evaluating evidence. Compare and contrast these two methods

Get Free Full Answer Here: https://universitywritingservices.com/submit-a-summary-of-six-of-your-arti/

What is evidence based evaluation?

Evidence-based evaluation entails assessing the effectiveness of programs, policies, or interventions based on the best available evidence. The goal of evidence-based evaluation is to provide an objective and comprehensive assessment of the impact of a particular intervention or program on the target population.

The process of evidence-based evaluation typically involves the following steps:

1. Formulating research questions: This involves defining the research questions to be answered by the evaluation and the outcomes that will be measured.
2. Conducting a literature review: This refers to reviewing the existing research literature to identify the best available evidence on the effectiveness of similar interventions.
3. Selecting appropriate research designs: This entails selecting appropriate research designs, such as randomized controlled trials or quasi-experimental designs, to answer the research questions.
4. Collecting and analyzing data: This is basically collecting data on the program or intervention and analyzing the data to determine the effectiveness of the program or intervention.
5. Drawing conclusions: This involves drawing conclusions based on the evidence gathered and making recommendations for future programs or interventions.

Evidence-based evaluation is a rigorous and systematic approach to evaluating the effectiveness of programs or interventions that can help to ensure that resources are used effectively and efficiently to achieve desired outcomes.

How to evaluate evidence in research

Evaluating evidence in research entails critically assessing the quality, relevance, and validity of the evidence to determine its reliability and usefulness in informing decisions. Here are some steps that can be taken to evaluate evidence in research:

1. Assess the study design: The study design used in the research can have a significant impact on the quality of the evidence. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are generally considered the gold standard for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, while observational studies may be more appropriate for investigating associations or risk factors.
2. Evaluate the sample size: The sample size of a study can affect the reliability of the results. Studies with larger sample sizes are generally more reliable and have greater statistical power.
3. Look at the quality of data collection: The quality of data collection methods used in the study can affect the accuracy and reliability of the evidence. The use of standardized and validated measures can increase the quality of data.
4. Assess the statistical analysis: The statistical analysis used to analyze the data can have an impact on the validity of the findings. The use of appropriate statistical methods and tests can increase the validity of the findings.
5. Consider the generalizability of the findings: The generalizability of the findings can depend on the characteristics of the study population and the setting in which the study was conducted. The findings may not be applicable to other populations or settings.
6. Look for potential biases: Bias in research can affect the validity and reliability of the evidence. Common sources of bias include selection bias, measurement bias, and confounding.
7. Evaluate the strength of the evidence: The strength of the evidence can be evaluated using a hierarchy of evidence that takes into account the study design, sample size, quality of data collection, statistical analysis, and potential biases.

Assessing evidence in research requires a critical and systematic approach to assessing the quality and relevance of the evidence. By doing so, it is possible to identify reliable and useful evidence that can inform decision-making.

Model used to evaluate level of research

There are several models that can be used to evaluate the level or quality of research. One commonly used model is the evidence hierarchy, which is often depicted as a pyramid. The evidence hierarchy is a way of ranking different types of research evidence based on their level of validity and reliability, with the highest quality evidence at the top of the pyramid. The evidence hierarchy is typically organized as follows, from highest to lowest quality of evidence:

1. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs): These are considered the highest level of evidence because they involve a comprehensive and systematic review of multiple RCTs.
2. Individual RCTs: These studies involve a comparison of an intervention to a control group in which participants are randomly assigned to the intervention or control group.
3. Non-randomized studies: These include observational studies, such as cohort studies or case-control studies, which are less reliable than RCTs because they do not involve randomization.
4. Case studies and case reports: These provide individual accounts of a specific patient or event, but do not involve comparison groups and therefore cannot provide strong evidence for causality.

The evidence hierarchy model is widely used to assess the level of evidence in healthcare research, but it can also be applied to research in other fields. However, it is important to note that the evidence hierarchy model is just one way of evaluating the quality of research evidence and should be used in combination with other methods, such as critical appraisal of individual studies and consideration of the broader context of the research question.